The survey contained step three parts. Part I integrated questions out-of socio-group data (ages, number of training, parity, familial income, career, latest relationship standing, sexual craft, history of HPV vaccination, and you may reputation for abnormal cervical cancers examination).
Area II composed of six questions regarding the prospective women who is going to be processed, ages first off, regularity, many years otherwise criteria to avoid out of tests, and methods from examination. Only the members who’d ever heard of HPV carry out go ahead to help you Region III which assessed knowledge about HPV out of its form of (oncogenic otherwise non-oncogenic), setting of indication and you will avoidance.
Prior to the study, this new survey out of part II and you can part III within the Thai version were contemplated, talked about, and modified up to opinion among 20 boffins who have been all gynecologic oncologists (specific was writers in other synchronous studies). The experts ranked every one of 19 questions due to the fact often ‘relevant’ otherwise ‘perhaps not relevant’. The item-top Blogs Validity List (I-CVI) try computed for each items, and the Stuff Legitimacy Index (CVI) is computed by using an average proportion off fourteen questions relating to knowledge about cervical malignant tumors assessment and you will 5 questions relating to HPV. The fresh new CVI was basically step 1 both for elements of the fresh survey (S1 Desk). The newest reliability is looked at for the 30 women with similar feature as the players. The fresh new Cronbach’ leader coefficients towards accuracy was 0.819 to have information about cervical cancer examination and you will 0.907 to possess knowledge about HPV.
Investigation collection
Into date away from arranged colposcopy, the analysis secretary offered guidance of your own data for the feminine who met addition conditions. The women which agreed to participate provided written advised consent and answered the questionnaire alone themselves in advance of continuing so you’re able to colposcopy.
Study built-up for it study was basically socio-market studies (Part I of survey), knowledge of cervical cancer tumors evaluation (Part II), and experience with HPV (Region III).
Analytical data
New responses of real information on the cervical disease testing and you can HPV have been reviewed from the per items just before scoring categorization. Proper answer is scored as step 1 while ‘wrong and you may not knowing answer’ is actually obtained 0.
Regarding fourteen questions away from cervical malignant tumors testing, female whoever score had been ? ten were arbitrarily categorized since that have ‘a beneficial knowledge’ if not have been regarded as which have “negative training”. To possess expertise in HPV, women whose address is ‘never ever been aware of HPV’ was basically omitted on the investigation from HPV training.
From 5 questions, feminine whoever get were ? step three had been thought to be having ‘a good expertise in HPV’ normally as the ‘not-good knowledge’. Off 19 issues, female whose rating was in fact ? thirteen was basically categorized since with ‘good full knowledge’ usually since ‘negative overall knowledge’.
The data was basically amassed in the an electronic digital database and you will reviewed having fun with SPSS V.twenty-six.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chi town, IL, USA). Descriptive analytics were utilized to analyze group data and was in fact described since numbers with fee, imply which have simple deviation or median which have diversity. This new association between for each and every variable and you may studies get was indeed assessed having fun with effortless linear regression. Exploratory design was made inside multivariable studies also most of the details possibly pertaining to the info get. The latest felt level of statistical relevance is an effective p-worth of 0.05 or smaller.
Abilities
Out https://getbride.org/da/makedonske-kvinder/ of 500 women who met inclusion criteria and were invited to the study, one ong 499 women who responded to the questionnaire about knowledge of cervical cancer and screening (part II) and knowledge about HPV (part II), two did not provide personal information. So demographic data were available in only 497 women (Table 1). The mean age of 497 participants was years (SD ± ). More than half of the participants were aged < 40>
